MySQL 5.6 的排序进行了优化. 同样的sql , 在5.5 跟5.6 上可能得到不同的结果:
CREATE TABLE `TestCase2` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`aValue` decimal(19,2) NOT NULL,
`accuracyClassType_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
`productType_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `FKF58064BD791396` (`productType_id`),
KEY `FKF58064BDED5076` (`accuracyClassType_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=17 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `TestCase2` (`id`, `aValue`, `accuracyClassType_id`, `productType_id`)
VALUES
(1,2.00,3,2),
(2,3.00,3,2),
(3,4.00,2,3),
(4,5.00,2,3),
(5,6.00,2,3),
(6,8.00,2,3),
(7,10.00,2,3),
(8,12.00,2,3),
(9,16.00,2,3),
(10,20.00,2,3),
(11,6.00,2,4),
(12,8.00,2,4),
(13,10.00,2,4),
(14,12.00,2,4),
(15,5.00,2,2),
(16,6.00,2,2);
select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc;
# as you can see mysql has added a fallback sorting because aValue is not unique, which is ok
# the first four id's of the results are: 10, 9, 14, 8
select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc limit 4;
# as expected the result id's (based on the order by) are : 10, 9, 14, 8
select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc limit 3;
# which surprisingly results in the following id's based on the order by: 10, 9, 8 ???????
# expecting id's: 10, 9, 14 (see query with limit 4)[19 Mar 2014 13:34] Miguel SolorzanoThank you for the bug report.
mysql 5.1 > select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc limit 4;
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| id | aValue | accuracyClassType_id | productType_id |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| 10 | 20.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 9 | 16.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 14 | 12.00 | 2 | 4 |
| 8 | 12.00 | 2 | 3 |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql 5.1 > select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc limit 3;
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| id | aValue | accuracyClassType_id | productType_id |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| 10 | 20.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 9 | 16.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 14 | 12.00 | 2 | 4 |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql 5.6 > select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc limit 4;
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| id | aValue | accuracyClassType_id | productType_id |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| 10 | 20.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 9 | 16.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 14 | 12.00 | 2 | 4 |
| 8 | 12.00 | 2 | 3 |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql 5.6 > select * from Testcase2 order by aValue desc limit 3;
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| id | aValue | accuracyClassType_id | productType_id |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
| 10 | 20.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 9 | 16.00 | 2 | 3 |
| 8 | 12.00 | 2 | 3 |
+----+--------+----------------------+----------------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql 5.5 跟 5.6 两个版本对排序的实现:
Mysql 5.5 willl
- allocate buffer space for 1000 rows
- scan the table, inserting each row into the buffer
- sort the buffer, this requires about 10.000 comparisons
- return the first 3 (or 4) rowsMysql
5.6 will
- allocate buffer space for 3 (or 4) rows
- scan the table, maintaining a collection of 3 (or 4) "winners" this requires about 2000 comparisons
- sort final set of "winners", this requires about 6 comparisons
- return the result
sql 标准里对于重复值的排序字段, 应该出哪行记录是没有定义的, 这就完全取决于代码的实现了.
我们的升级测试,可能会涉及到 5.5 与5.6 的结果对比, 这里可能会引起疑问.
这是正常的. 如果确实需要严格的排序,实现5.6 跟5.5 同样的显示结果.
需要修改sql 语句, 在排序子句中加上 一个唯一字段.
参考:
https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?spm=5176.100239.blogcont27649.4.tlI76p&id=72076
http://didrikdidrik.blogspot.co.uk/
分享文章：关于mysql5.6的排序问题.
分享路径：
http://6mz.cn/article/posped.html